Big Double Whammy For Bonds, But With a Few Caveats

While we may not have a great explanation or even the capacity to believe it, nonfarm payrolls came in at 517,000 this morning versus a median forecast of 185,000.  The bond market has reacted about like you'd expect: with a large, immediate sell-off.  While that number does indeed seem very high (and it is--especially relative to the forecast), there are two caveats. 1. It doesn't look ridiculously high in the context of the past 2 years.   2. Today's data was also affected by the annual re-working of seasonal adjustment factors.  This isn't some conspiracy or deception.  The BLS (the entity that collects and publishes this data) has an established procedure for updating seasonal adjustments once per year.  The changing landscape of the post-pandemic labor market has thrown a few curve balls to revision processes such as this.  And while we can't comment on whether this particular revision caused overly optimistic distortion of today's number, it's fair to say it may have helped the number be a bit higher than it otherwise would have been.   But before you cry foul and blame BLS math for overstating the level of employment, consider that the NON-ADJUSTED numbers suggest an average monthly job gain of more than 400k over the past year (same as the adjusted numbers).   Adding insult to injury is a significantly stronger number reported in ISM's non-manufacturing index 90 minutes after the jobs report. The index came in at 55.2 vs a median forecast of 50.4.  That is definitely a big "beat," and an even bigger improvement from the 49.2 reported last month, but the caveat is much more obvious in this case.  Last month really sucked and economists incorrectly guessed that today's number would follow suit.  Here too, changes in seasonal patterns are likely contributing to forecasting errors. Given all of the above, the 11bp sell off in 10yr yields and the half point loss in MBS seem reasonable.  Both remain in stronger territory vs last week.
http://dlvr.it/ShvGS6

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#ForBuyers #ForSellers #Pricing #HousingMarketUpdates Home Prices Still Growing – Just at a More Normal Pace: If you’re feeling a bit muddy on what’s happening with home prices, that’s no surprise. http://dlvr.it/Sz993K

Will a Silver Tsunami Change the 2024 Housing Market? Have you ever heard the term “Silver Tsunami” and wondered what it's all about? If so, that might be because there’s been lot of talk about it online recently. Let's dive into what it is and why it won't drastically impact the housing market. What Does Silver Tsunami Mean? A recent article from HousingWire calls it: “. . . a colloquialism referring to aging Americans changing their housing arrangements to accommodate aging . . .” The thought is that as baby boomers grow older, a significant number will start downsizing their homes. Considering how large that generation is, if these moves happened in a big wave, it would affect the housing market by causing a significant uptick in the number of larger homes for sale. That influx of homes coming onto the market would impact the balance of supply and demand and more. The concept makes sense in theory, but will it happen? And if so, when? Why It Won’t Have a Huge Impact on the Housing Market in 2024 Experts say, so far, a silver tsunami hasn’t happened – and it probably won't anytime soon. According to that same article from HousingWire: “. . . the silver tsunami’s transformative potential for the U.S. housing market has not yet materialized in any meaningful way, and few expect it to anytime soon.” Clearly, not every baby boomer is planning to sell or move – and even those who do won’t do it all at once. Instead, it will be more gradual, happening slowly over time. If you’re worried about a Silver Tsunami shaking up the housing market, don’t be. Any impact from baby boomers moving will be gradual over many years. Fleming sums it up best: “Demographic trends, they don't tsunami. They trickle.” #realestate #homeownership #homebuying www.DanFreshley.com